In development: shared for comment. Pages appear here once they pass our fact-check. Send feedback

Themes

Evidence before scale-up

Everything tagged with this theme. The country and profession filters at the top still apply.

Reforms

No reforms for these filters.

Explainers & analysis

Analysis

Permanent before evaluated

In Australia, pharmacy scope reforms have been made permanent before any independent evaluation was published. In the UK, physician associates were scaled up with no study of safety incidents. We think that is the strongest, evidence-based criticism of these reforms.

Protect Health editors · October 2026

Nothing written for these filters.

Library

Black & Baldwin, LSE · 2010

Really responsive risk-based regulation

Two leading regulation scholars set out the built-in limits of risk-based regulation: it can miss cumulative, systemic and newly emerging risks, and depends on the regulator's ability to detect risk.

Why it matters: A theoretical lens. The paper is about regulating firms; applying it to hard-to-measure harms such as psychological harm is our interpretation, not evidence of harm.

ResearchExternalEvidence before scale-up
BMJ (Greenhalgh & McKee) · Mar 2025

Physician associates and anaesthetic associates in UK: rapid systematic review of recent UK based research

Reviewed UK research on physician and anaesthetic associates published from 2015 to January 2025. Of 29 studies meeting its inclusion standard, none examined safety incidents and only one directly observed clinical competence.

Why it matters: In our view, a clear statement of the evidence gap: the authors warn that absence of evidence of safety incidents is not evidence that the roles are safe. Co-author Martin McKee was BMA president in 2022-23.

ResearchExternalEvidence before scale-up
GOV.UK · 16 Jul 2025

The Leng review: an independent review into physician associate and anaesthesia associate professions

An independent review found the evidence on the roles weak and based on observational data. It made 18 recommendations, including renaming the roles 'physician assistant' and 'physician assistant in anaesthesia', and requiring a named supervising doctor for each physician assistant. The government accepted all of them.

Why it matters: In our view, a template for how a government re-tightens a role after scaling it ahead of the evidence.

Professional Standards Authority · 7 Oct 2025

Right-touch regulation (third edition)

The current version of the framework. It keeps the six principles and eight elements, sets out a broad definition of harm (including psychological harm, financial loss and damage to trust), accepts that deregulation can be warranted where risk is well managed, and aligns with the UK's 'Smarter regulation' agenda.

Why it matters: The primary source. Worth quoting directly, including its own warnings about false assurance, and that regulation should only be called 'risk-based' where risks have actually been quantified and qualified.

Official reportExternalAccredited & voluntary registers

No library items for these filters.