In development: shared for comment. Pages appear here once they pass our fact-check. Send feedback

Australia · Canada · New Zealand · United Kingdom

Who is qualified to care for you is being rewritten.

Governments and regulators in four countries are proposing shorter training routes, widening who can do what, and changing how health professions are regulated. They call it "right-touch", "right-sized" or "top of scope". We track each reform, set out the evidence, and ask one question: has anyone checked that it is safe?

17
reforms tracked
6
decisions pending
4
countries
12
groups pushing back

Tracked

Every reform has its own page, with its status and the date we last checked it.

Fair

We set out each government's or regulator's own reasons, in their words where we can, and give the case for every change alongside the concerns.

Fact-checked

Every page is checked against its sources before it is published, and our analysis labels its claims as evidence, survey or assertion.

What's changing now

All reforms →
Australia

Dawson review of the national registration scheme

An independent review found the scheme had "become too inward-looking, too fragmented, and too slow to respond to emerging risks and opportunities". Health Ministers accepted governance changes in May 2026 but deferred an integrated, risk-based framework for regulating all health professions.

Decided, awaiting governmentchecked 9 Oct 2026

No tracked reforms match these filters yet. See all reforms.

Explainers & analysis

All pieces →
Analysis

Permanent before evaluated

In Australia, pharmacy scope reforms have been made permanent before any independent evaluation was published. In the UK, physician associates were scaled up with no study of safety incidents. We think that is the strongest, evidence-based criticism of these reforms.

Protect Health editors · October 2026

Nothing written for these filters yet.

From the library

Full library →
Newsroom (opinion, Ian Powell) · 19 Aug 2026

Simeon Brown's health practitioners bill puts political whims ahead of public safety

An opinion piece by Ian Powell, former executive director of ASMS, arguing New Zealand's HPCA Amendment Bill gives the Health Minister too much power over independent health regulators.

Why it matters: Captures what we see as the main criticism in New Zealand: political control of regulators, rather than lighter-touch regulation as such.

News & commentaryExternalRegulator independence
Australian Psychological Society · Jun 2026

APS response to the Psychology Board's higher education pathway redesign

The APS says it does 'not support the proposed five-year model proceeding in its current form', citing safety, the drop in qualification level, placements, and an undefined assistant role.

Why it matters: The APS's formal, Board-endorsed position on what the Psychology Board calls a once-in-a-generation reform of psychology training.

Position statementExternalTraining standards
Australian Association of Psychologists (AAPi) · Apr 2026

Major proposed changes to psychology education and training

AAPi's summary of the Psychology Board's proposal: a single five-year degree to registration, no internship or national exam for domestic graduates, and a possible assistant exit. AAPi sees access benefits but is concerned about the drop to AQF Level 8.

Why it matters: A plain-English summary of the model the Board consulted on in April 2026. AAPi later said it does not support a five-year AQF Level 8 degree, and in September 2026 the Board said it will drop the assistant exit from the reform.

Position statementExternalTraining standards
Court of Appeal (England and Wales) · 20 Feb 2026

BMA v General Medical Council [2026] EWCA Civ 143

The Court of Appeal dismissed the BMA's challenge to the GMC's use of the term 'medical professionals' for both doctors and physician and anaesthesia associates in Good Medical Practice. A separate judicial review by Anaesthetists United, seeking national limits on scope of practice, was dismissed by the High Court in September 2025.

Why it matters: The courts found the GMC acted lawfully on both terminology and scope of practice. In our view, change will have to come through policy, not litigation.

Court judgmentExternalRegulator independence
College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario · Dec 2025

Statement by the CPBAO on registration changes

Ontario's regulator announces that its Board approved registering psychologists from approved graduate programs, cutting the experience requirement for master's candidates from four years to one, and recognising accrediting bodies outside the US. It says it will keep working on approaches that support 'fairness, labour mobility, and improved access to care'.

Why it matters: The regulator's own words. Quote this rather than second-hand descriptions of the change.

Position statementExternalTitle protection & public confusion

No library items match these filters yet.