In development: shared for comment. Pages appear here once they pass our fact-check. Send feedback

Themes

Title protection & public confusion

Everything tagged with this theme. The country and profession filters at the top still apply.

Reforms

No reforms for these filters.

Explainers & analysis

Nothing written for these filters.

Library

College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario · Dec 2025

Statement by the CPBAO on registration changes

Ontario's regulator announces that its Board approved registering psychologists from approved graduate programs, cutting the experience requirement for master's candidates from four years to one, and recognising accrediting bodies outside the US. It says it will keep working on approaches that support 'fairness, labour mobility, and improved access to care'.

Why it matters: The regulator's own words. Quote this rather than second-hand descriptions of the change.

Position statementExternalTitle protection & public confusion
GOV.UK · 16 Jul 2025

The Leng review: an independent review into physician associate and anaesthesia associate professions

An independent review found the evidence on the roles weak and based on observational data. It made 18 recommendations, including renaming the roles 'physician assistant' and 'physician assistant in anaesthesia', and requiring a named supervising doctor for each physician assistant. The government accepted all of them.

Why it matters: In our view, a template for how a government re-tightens a role after scaling it ahead of the evidence.

Courts and Tribunals Judiciary · 31 Jul 2024

Susan Pollitt: Prevention of Future Deaths report

A senior coroner found that an ascitic drain, which a junior doctor had decided to place, was not clinically indicated. The physician associate who inserted it was unaware of local guidance, left it in for 21 hours and directed that it be clamped, which the coroner found was unwarranted. The report also raises the absence of a regulator at the time, title confusion, and a competency sign-off that covered only the technical skill of inserting the drain, not consent, risk factors or aftercare.

Why it matters: Its first concern was that there was then no regulator at all, so it does not show that proportionate regulation fails; its other concerns (training, supervision, the title, competency sign-off) remain relevant under regulation.

Inquiry / coronerExternalPatient safety incidents
Psychology Today (opinion) · Oct 2025

Rethinking who can be called a psychologist

An opinion piece by psychologist Monnica T. Williams supporting Ontario's proposal to let master's and doctoral graduates share the psychologist title, arguing that opposition from professional associations reflects elitism more than public safety.

Why it matters: A clear statement of the case for the change, from a supporter. Read it alongside the CPA/OPA joint letter for the case against.

News & commentaryExternalTitle protection & public confusion

No library items for these filters.