In development: shared for comment. Pages appear here once they pass our fact-check. Send feedback

Themes

Training standards

Everything tagged with this theme. The country and profession filters at the top still apply.

Reforms

No reforms for these filters.

Explainers & analysis

Nothing written for these filters.

Library

Australian Association of Psychologists (AAPi) · Apr 2026

Major proposed changes to psychology education and training

AAPi's summary of the Psychology Board's proposal: a single five-year degree to registration, no internship or national exam for domestic graduates, and a possible assistant exit. AAPi sees access benefits but is concerned about the drop to AQF Level 8.

Why it matters: A plain-English summary of the model the Board consulted on in April 2026. AAPi later said it does not support a five-year AQF Level 8 degree, and in September 2026 the Board said it will drop the assistant exit from the reform.

Position statementExternalTraining standards
Australian Psychological Society · Jun 2026

APS response to the Psychology Board's higher education pathway redesign

The APS says it does 'not support the proposed five-year model proceeding in its current form', citing safety, the drop in qualification level, placements, and an undefined assistant role.

Why it matters: The APS's formal, Board-endorsed position on what the Psychology Board calls a once-in-a-generation reform of psychology training.

Position statementExternalTraining standards
College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario · Dec 2025

Statement by the CPBAO on registration changes

Ontario's regulator announces that its Board approved registering psychologists from approved graduate programs, cutting the experience requirement for master's candidates from four years to one, and recognising accrediting bodies outside the US. It says it will keep working on approaches that support 'fairness, labour mobility, and improved access to care'.

Why it matters: The regulator's own words. Quote this rather than second-hand descriptions of the change.

Position statementExternalTitle protection & public confusion
New Zealand Cabinet paper · Aug 2025

Policy approval for amendments to the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act

The New Zealand government's case for reform. It criticises 'unnecessarily high standards', long training and strict supervision, 'patch protection' and siloed regulators, and names associate psychologists among new professions it says regulators have been slow to adapt to, citing 'professional resistance or lack of direction from government'.

Why it matters: A strikingly direct statement of what the government believes is wrong with professional regulation. It mentions psychology once, naming associate psychologists as a new profession.

Official reportExternalRegulator independence

No library items for these filters.